AP Required Supreme Court Cases

Supreme Court Cases Details Download

Short video explanations of each case

Practice AP Test

CON-2: Federalism reflects the dynamic distribution of power between national and state governments.
LOR-2: Provisions of the U.S. Constitution’s Bill of Rights are continually being interpreted to balance the power of government and the civil liberties of individuals.
LOR-3: Protections of the Bill of Rights have been selectively incorporated by way of the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause to prevent state infringement of basic liberties.
PRD-1: The 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause as well as other constitutional provisions have often been used to support the advancement of equality.
PRD-2: The impact of federal policies on campaigning and electoral rules continues to be contested by both sides of the political spectrum.
CON-3: The republican ideal in the U.S. is manifested in the structure and operation of the legislative branch.
  • Baker v. Carr (1961) - Opened the door to equal protection challenges to redistricting and the development of the “one person, one vote” doctrine by ruling that challenges to redistricting did not raise “political questions” that would keep federal courts from reviewing such challenges.
  • Shaw v. Reno (1993) - Majority minority districts, created under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, may be constitutionally challenged by voters if race is the only factor used in creating the district.
CON-5: The design of the judicial branch protects the Supreme Court’s independence as a branch of government, and the emergence and use of judicial review remains a powerful judicial practice.
  • Marbury v. Madison (1803) - Established the principle of judicial review empowering the Supreme Court to nullify an act of the legislative or executive branch that violates the Constitution.
Additional Court Cases

Relevant Court Cases on Redistricting